Comments on: No eviedence of impeachable acts? No laws were broken by President Bush and his staff? Should he be charged? http://tornadoquestions.com/no-eviedence-of-impeachable-acts-no-laws-were-broken-by-president-bush-and-his-staff-should-he-be-charged.htm Fri, 10 Sep 2010 07:12:45 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Butterbar Bob http://tornadoquestions.com/no-eviedence-of-impeachable-acts-no-laws-were-broken-by-president-bush-and-his-staff-should-he-be-charged.htm/comment-page-1#comment-12342 Butterbar Bob Mon, 08 Feb 2010 04:48:58 +0000 http://tornadoquestions.com/no-eviedence-of-impeachable-acts-no-laws-were-broken-by-president-bush-and-his-staff-should-he-be-charged.htm#comment-12342 Well, that's a really big list of crap charges. How pathetic. Well, that’s a really big list of crap charges. How pathetic.

]]> By: Danny Bmore http://tornadoquestions.com/no-eviedence-of-impeachable-acts-no-laws-were-broken-by-president-bush-and-his-staff-should-he-be-charged.htm/comment-page-1#comment-12343 Danny Bmore Mon, 08 Feb 2010 04:48:58 +0000 http://tornadoquestions.com/no-eviedence-of-impeachable-acts-no-laws-were-broken-by-president-bush-and-his-staff-should-he-be-charged.htm#comment-12343 unless you liberals are going to present some evidence, no one is going to take impeachment seriously. these "news stories" you cite must have been on some commie newsletter because George Bush is an honest and decent President who was fairly elected and would never knowingly or purposefully do any wrong doing. As a Christian he would not let any of these thing happen to his fellow man. unless you liberals are going to present some evidence, no one is going to take impeachment seriously.

these "news stories" you cite must have been on some commie newsletter because George Bush is an honest and decent President who was fairly elected and would never knowingly or purposefully do any wrong doing.

As a Christian he would not let any of these thing happen to his fellow man.

]]> By: bush deathgrip http://tornadoquestions.com/no-eviedence-of-impeachable-acts-no-laws-were-broken-by-president-bush-and-his-staff-should-he-be-charged.htm/comment-page-1#comment-12340 bush deathgrip Mon, 08 Feb 2010 04:48:58 +0000 http://tornadoquestions.com/no-eviedence-of-impeachable-acts-no-laws-were-broken-by-president-bush-and-his-staff-should-he-be-charged.htm#comment-12340 bring it on bring it on

]]> By: sgreger1 http://tornadoquestions.com/no-eviedence-of-impeachable-acts-no-laws-were-broken-by-president-bush-and-his-staff-should-he-be-charged.htm/comment-page-1#comment-12341 sgreger1 Mon, 08 Feb 2010 04:48:58 +0000 http://tornadoquestions.com/no-eviedence-of-impeachable-acts-no-laws-were-broken-by-president-bush-and-his-staff-should-he-be-charged.htm#comment-12341 Omg you just wasted 2 seconds of my life having to scroll all the way down here just to post this and say your a moron and im not reading your mantra AGAIN. But thank you sir for my 2 points. Omg you just wasted 2 seconds of my life having to scroll all the way down here just to post this and say your a moron and im not reading your mantra AGAIN. But thank you sir for my 2 points.

]]> By: trickdwire http://tornadoquestions.com/no-eviedence-of-impeachable-acts-no-laws-were-broken-by-president-bush-and-his-staff-should-he-be-charged.htm/comment-page-1#comment-12344 trickdwire Mon, 08 Feb 2010 04:48:58 +0000 http://tornadoquestions.com/no-eviedence-of-impeachable-acts-no-laws-were-broken-by-president-bush-and-his-staff-should-he-be-charged.htm#comment-12344 The only thing about impeachment that I have a problem with is that republicans think it is so far fetched. It's not. The only thing about impeachment that I have a problem with is that republicans think it is so far fetched. It’s not.

]]>